Write a 6 pages paper on religion and theology global culture and ethics. As a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration shall strive by teaching and education to promote salutation for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to safeguard their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of territories and among the peoples of Member States themselves which falls under their jurisdiction.The Declaration is introduced by a preamble describing the fundamental characteristics of the rights which are qualified as being “natural, unalienable and sacred” and consisting of “simple and incontestable principles” on which citizens could base their demands. In the second article, the subject matter was for the destruction of aristocratic privileges by proclaiming an end to&nbsp.feudalism and to exemptions from taxation, freedom, and equal rights for all human beings (referred to as “Men”), and access to public office based on talent. The monarchy was restricted, and all citizens are allowed to take part in the legislative process.&nbsp.Freedom of speech and press were declared, and arbitrary arrests outlawed. The Declaration also asserted the principles of popular sovereignty, the rights of the king in contrast to that characterized the French monarchy, and social equality among citizens, eliminating the special rights of the nobility and clergy.Historians have often sought to identify the sources that most influenced the words and&nbsp.political philosophy&nbsp.of the Declaration of Independence. By Jefferson’s own admission, the Declaration contained no original ideas but was instead a statement of sentiments widely shared by supporters of the American Revolution.Sue J. Kims&nbsp.Critiquing Postmodernism in Contemporary Discourses of Race exposes important interventions is to suggest that an uncritical celebration of difference for its own sake leaves no way to judge between varied expressions of difference.